TRA Backs 82.89% Duties on Chinese Boom Lifts
The Trade Remedies Authority has moved a step closer to new anti-dumping duties on boom lifts imported from China, saying the evidence now supports a remedy of up to 82.89%. In its intended final determination, published on Monday 5 October 2026, the TRA said Chinese imports were being dumped into the UK market and that this had caused, or was causing, injury to domestic producers. For readers outside the plant and access equipment trade, boom lifts are the machines more commonly known as cherry pickers. They are used to raise workers, tools and materials for jobs at height, making them a familiar sight across construction sites, maintenance work and installation projects.
That matters because this is not a niche product dispute with little reach beyond a single factory gate. Boom lifts sit inside day-to-day business activity across the UK, from commercial fit-outs to infrastructure maintenance, so any change in import costs can travel quickly through supply chains. According to the TRA, the case rests on a straightforward claim: Chinese suppliers have been selling into the UK at prices low enough to place serious pressure on local manufacturers. For UK producers, the argument is about more than lost sales. It is also about margins, production planning and whether domestic firms can compete when imported machines arrive at sharply cheaper prices.
The investigation began on 19 December 2025 and examined import volumes, cost of production, pricing data and a range of injury factors. The TRA said its work found Chinese boom lift prices undercut the UK industry by more than 25%, a figure that helps explain why the proposed duties are so high. In trade remedy terms, dumping means goods are sold abroad for less than their normal value, usually judged against the price of similar goods in the exporter’s home market. Anti-dumping duties are then used to narrow that gap. In plain terms, they are an extra charge designed to stop imported products gaining an unfair price edge.
The TRA has also completed its Economic Interest Test, which is one of the more important parts of the UK system. It is not enough for the authority to decide that dumping took place. It must also decide whether action makes sense for the wider UK economy once the effect on producers, importers and buyers is taken into account. On that point, the TRA’s view is clear. It said the measure is in the UK’s economic interest and that it intends to recommend the remedy to the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade. That follows an earlier step on 20 August 2026, when the government imposed provisional anti-dumping measures after a previous TRA recommendation.
For businesses that buy, hire or finance this equipment, the practical question is what happens to costs if the duties are confirmed. A higher import charge can make Chinese-sourced machines less attractive on price, which may offer UK producers some breathing space after a prolonged spell of pressure from lower-cost competition. But there is another side to it. Plant hire firms, contractors and maintenance businesses will be watching for any pass-through into fleet budgets and project costs. If imported units become noticeably dearer, buyers may face tougher choices on replacement cycles, rental pricing or supplier mix. That is why this case will be read closely well beyond manufacturing.
The dates now matter. Businesses that think they may be affected can comment through the TRA public file until 20 October 2026, after which the authority may review any extra evidence before sending its final recommendation to ministers. The formal period of investigation runs from 1 October 2024 to 30 September 2025, while the injury assessment covers 1 October 2021 to 30 September 2025. For the market, the next phase is less about whether concerns have been raised and more about whether the final measure stays at this level once businesses have had their say. Until then, UK producers have a stronger signal of support, while importers and equipment buyers are left weighing what a tougher trade stance could mean for prices.